Steven Mooner Usher

In a quiet Somerset bedroom, shuffling away manically, at the latter end of the last millennium, sat a young gentlemen, robust but malleable in build, nonchalant and apathetic in character. In the room below him bustled dozens of atypical gentleman, all handing out ludicrous money in exchange for pleasures of the throat, unbeknown to whom, the little fella upstairs was only years away from climaxing his efforts. Ryan was, of course, masturbating his guitar frets with feverish enthusiasm, pursuing the excellence that now epitomises the crisp clarity of his live performance, and the gentleman were no less than the paying customers of the Crown Inn, Ilminster.

On Monday 18th August 2008 was a double jamboree for those close to Ryan, as that fateful day not only saw the release of his Album, cleverly titled “” (the album art is a Scrabble rack with the tiles all blank), but also we had to waste money on buying some presents that he scarcely deserved, by virtue of it being his birthday. Ten years on from a deluge of fond memories of knowing Ryan before he was ridiculously good, the fruits of his dedication have ripened in to a sublime acoustic collection of genuine quality, a reservoir of sometimes melancholic, sometimes introspective, always alluring insights to a genuinely dear person.

Having grown up with many of the songs as backdrops to an eventful youth, and progressive adulthood, its apt that songs such as ‘Feel Any Feeling’ are opening the album in the finest possible fashion. I’m not one to pigeon-hole and typecast, but fans of John Mayer, Howie Day, Josh Groban etc would find more than enough moments throughout the album to ask themselves “why is this boy unsigned exactly?”.

The track listing is as follows:

• Intros
• Feel Any Feeling
• For You
• There’s A Scene
• Forgive Me
• My Weaknes
• 3D
• If I Fall
• How Things Change
• Footprint
• Destiny
• Panic
• Mellow Rumours
• Look FWD

Without any deference to the rest of the tracks on the album, highlights definitely include ‘Feel Any Feeling’, ‘There’s A Scene’, and ‘Destiny’, and the instrumental ‘Mellow Rumours’.

‘Feel Any Feeling’ exerts a confidence in his clear ability to manipulate the guitars limitations to his advantage, delicately dancing a cultivated wire, with a less than simple technique when coupled with the mundane tasks of both playing the tune and singing whilst holding a gloriously pain-soaked reverberating ‘drum’ rhythm by using the body of his acoustic guitar. There is also a noteworthy extension of his vocal chords, that perfectly parades the aforementioned dedication, drenched in integrity and fidelity to every word he sings.
‘There’s A Scene’ offers a glimpse of the soft-romanticism that flows through him on stage, with a Kooks-esque rhythm that if it doesn’t sucker you in on first listen I would sincerely question your existence.
‘Destiny’ sees Ryan extend his arm to a more popular and accessible sound, and with no detriment to the music at all, a simpler structure. The result is a gorgeous array of vocals and guitar that could easily be a throwback to any genre as much as it could be the new sound.

To listen to some of the songs from the album, and to place orders and contact Ryan himself I urge you to get over to his Profile and allow yourself to discover a talent of unbridled capacity.

The greatest crime in the world is not developing your potential. When you do what you do best, you are helping not only yourself, but the world. I sincerely hope the world are one day beneficiaries of his gift.

To you my dear friend, I raise a glass and say ‘congratulations’ on a fine album that will most certainly act a stepping-stone to stronger rewards, and I look forward to witnessing the development and release of your second album, which will be released through a label, of that I am certain. I do find you rather annoying and tiresome though, and fat. Well, I say fat, you’re more just…an irregular shape, like a garethlellogram. So… just email me when you release it yeah.

I recently wrote about Advanced Web Ranking, and the issues faced with that, but it transpires that Google has blocked all ranking software available for SEO’s and webmasters. Google is successful at presenting information to the world almost purely because that information has been presented to them, and by who? SEO’s of course. If it weren’t for us we’d have titles like “home”, and alt tags missing, which, although they can get abused at times, are still providing much needed information to the blind community. We use these softwares to measure how successful we are presenting our clients web-pages, and we require them to provide proof of our efforts.

Google has put itself in a position of authority, and is operating an intentional maneuver to secure more PPC business. I had never viewed it that way until my boss brought this to my attention this morning, and how very right he seems now. Google shouldn’t necessarily embrace SEO, but they are abusing their position as the worlds number one search engine and manipulating businesses to part with their cash in their on-going pursuit of becoming the internets China. Google and SEO need to be like two old band members that just tolerate each other for the greater good, occasionally we’ll bicker and we may even exchange the odd blow, but we’ll still stick together and maybe even swap Christmas cards, but right now Google has an AK47 pressed right between our eyes and they’re not afraid to pull a trigger or two.

For the uninitiated, Matt Cutts is God. He invented life and gave it some order. If he were to cry I would drink his tears and never wee again. Either way, he’s posted a rather bizarre story on his blog, or, whats more likely is that he’s posted a great story and I’m not worthy enough to understand.

In actual fact, the post itself is fine, an informative tutorial on Javascript Bookmarklets, but within this he’s referenced a service that just plain confuses me, particularly from an SEO perspective.

The site serves as a URL shortening service. You type a long URL in, and hey presto you have a shorter version that when published and clicked on a webpage will go through them. What the purpose of this is I really do not know? I have never needed to shorten a URL that badly, and yes, with SEO you need to make URL’s more search engine friendly, but to drive them through another site would obviously defeat the object of this. the standard practice for this is Mod ReWrite, and it works wonderfully, is easy to understand, and easy to put in to action.

There is obviously a point to the service they provide, but I’m not the man to understand it, so if anyone knows why this is helpful then please, let me know!

Those in the SEO industry will be familiar with Advanced Web Ranking, a software that collects hundreds of search results for selected keywords in selected search engines, and displays the results in an easy-to-report. You can customise the display to include results for the top 1000, 500, or 100 results, but recently it has only been displaying the result if it is in the top 10, and any result there after is deemed to have dropped out of the top 100, and is displayed as such.

I have wrote to AWRs’ support team, and have had zero response, and it has no been approximately a week since my correspondence to them.

The problem is, in an industry that demands results, I am exposing myself to the claws of disgruntled customers, and I feel Google should acknowledge their responsibility to the hundreds of thousands of SEO’s out there that rely on these statistics to prove the fruits of their labours. Google needs SEO as much as SEO needs Google. Without the optimisation work we do on sites all over the world, there would be a deluge of technically poorer sites, our work is to present a website in its optimum state, and only black-hat SEO should be punished.

Still, there’s always Cuil.

Personal Injury Solicitors/Lawyers operate on a very fine line between hero and harassment. By the nature of their work, ie; accusing businessmen and women of malpractice in its various forms for financial benefit, you could argue they are soaked in hypocrisy, and using the money of innocent business owners across the globe to dry themselves off. But what of the claimants? Shouldn’t these people be the bearers of the blame? Are they really only making the claims they are because of all the television advertising? It’s my personal opinion that these claimants are entitled to their day in court, and the injury solicitor in charge of the claim is entitled to represent his/her client as so they wish.

Its’ too easy to suggest that they are carrying out the devils work, when in actual fact this industry would not exist were it not for complacent business owners, motorists, medical practitioners, and everyone else it seems. A claim would not succeed if the person/business accused were not at fault. And I dread to think of the day when a drunken motorist or faulty highway causes me to lose my legs and I feel unable to claim for the devastation to my life for fear of public response.

Of course, there is a clear distinction to be made in severity of case, and it’s true to say that America has ran away with the idea to no limit, and people are now making claims for being born with hair, and not having enough fries with their Extra large McDonalds’ meal. But when we consider that this is a country who willingly put a small child in charge of their economy it comes as no surprise.

In the 90’s new practices were introduced that allowed legal firms to operate a no win no fee strategy, and in doing so this opened up the market to many new and potential clients, but it also forced them to consider each case carefully, only moving forward with legitimate and worthy claims.

It is this distinction that determines whether a case is blatant money chasing or legitimate need for compensation. If there is a genuine claim, my view is that the injury solicitors are doing a fair job for a needy victim, the problem arises when we’re compelled to claim for a paper-cut after buying an A5 note-pad on which to write down all our woes.

No Win No Fee

Article Source: Here

There has been much in the way of ‘hype’ surrounding the search engine Cuil, but I’m struggling to see anything close to interesting about this whole sordid affair other than the 4 original developers have all at some point been employed by Google. And unfortunately for Cuil, unless there are some seismic reassessments of their aim as a Search Engine, that’s exactly where the Google parallels will end.

My Firefox home-page is set to BBC News, and every morning I will read the Technology section with keen eyes, seeking out any developments either by or affecting the search market, (and the occasional post of purely personal interest,) so when, one morning recently the leading story had been put up with the headline: Search Site Aims To Rival Google, I’m sure it will come as no surprise that I wee’d myself a little. It’s the equivalent of a Premiership footballer falling in to a deep vat of dangerously young girls, or Duffys’ record label giving her the green light to write another album of horrifically crap wankery, or me watching Fern Cotton dying painfully…anyway, this was the kind of headline you can wish for, but never truly expect to see. So I read the story, became intrigued, and went to test out Cuil.

Now, I remember one Christmas really REALLY wanting a mountain bike, and getting a pair of green corduroy trousers instead, so this is perhaps the second most disappointed I have ever been, but try it for yourselves, and form your own conclusions. It’s not the worst engine I’ve used, but a serious rival to Google it isn’t. I’m a more serious rival to Google, and as you’ve probably figured, I’m human, albeit a poorly assembled one.

To save me the rigmarole of ridiculously detailed critiques, I’ll resort to the age-old tactic of statistics, 90% of which are made up anyway:

• Aesthetics 6/10 - Its’ best point, but trying too hard in fact
• Functionality 2/10 - My personal opinion is that semantics are for people without the intelligence to know what they are looking for in the first place
• Relevance of Results 0/10 - It’s insane, i think it must genuinely randomly pick some pages from its all too boasted of 120 billion index

That is truly the most damning statistic of them all. I could go in to huge depth about no-one having an allegiance to Google, and how all we want are the most relevance results, but I suffice to leave it there for the sake of the hernia thats been growing in the process of writing this.

Lets allow the results to speak for themselves. Given that my personal site did not appear in their indeces, I searched for “submit URL cuil” (without quotations), and the results were fascinating, completely irrelevant, but fascinating. Furthermore, it returned only 7 results! What happened to that 120 billion index? Googles’ minuscule index returned me a paltry 35,700.

“Cuil” is supposedly the Gaelic for “wisdom”, and I’m obliged to report that this shambles of a search engine clearly think we are not as Cuil as we merit.

Harris Fowler Personal Injury Solicitors, based in Taunton, Somerset, have long established themselves at the fore of the injury solicitors market.
In their own words:
“What we do
Personal Injury
If you’ve suffered an accident or a personal injury you could be entitled to make a compensation claim. We have specialist teams of dedicated and experienced personal injury lawyers who can help you claim compensation on an no win, no fee, no risk basis.

Serious Injury
Harris Fowler has extensive experience of dealing with high value injury claims, typically involving brain, head and/or spinal injuries – normally referred to as ‘catastrophic injury’.

Military Injury
The Armed Forces Compensation Scheme is the compensation package for members of the Armed Forces. It provides compensation, irrespective of fault, across the full range of circumstances in which illness, injury or death may arise as a result of service.

Professional Negligence
Because of our depth of knowledge of Personal Injury work we can and do bring negligence cases against other solicitors for mishandling personal injury cases.”