Nov 14

Google CEO Eric Schmidt didn’t say anything as he flanked President-elect Barack Obama during his first post-election press conference. He didn’t have to.

The image alone of Schmidt standing elbow-to-elbow with Obama’s top economic thinkers was enough to send shivers up the spine of Google’s competitors.

“This terrifies Microsoft,” said a Democratic lobbyist familiar with the industry. “There’s a reason why people are scared to death of Google.”

Last Friday’s press conference Friday came just two days after Google threw in the towel on an attempted Internet advertising partnership with Yahoo, the older, but struggling Web company. Google said that the prospect of an antitrust lawsuit from the Justice Department was the key deal breaker. Yahoo, which needed the deal more than Google, had said it was willing to fight the government, but Google didn’t have the stomach for a protracted legal battle.

So an open question for Google is whether the search-engine giant’s newfound closeness with the Democratic president-elect will give the company the muscle it needs to win disputes with the government over deals such as the Yahoo partnership.

Google says that Schmidt was acting on his own, and his politics don’t reflect the company’s official stance.

“Eric’s endorsement of Senator Obama was a personal matter, and as a company Google was neutral in the campaign,” said Adam Kovacevich, Google’s senior manager of global communications and public affairs. “We look forward to working with the new administration and congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle to keep the Internet open and to promote economic growth.”

Obama’s transition team declined comment.

Some insiders, though, say Schmidt is inevitably identified with the company he leads. And they say that could benefit Google, not on the big decisions in Washington, but on the accumulation of smaller, less-visible matters. “A lot of decisions are made in the gray areas and at the low levels,’ explained the Democratic lobbyist.

“From the staff attorney all the way up the line, everybody now knows that Google is close to Obama,” the lobbyist said. And that could subtly affect the policy playing field in Google’s favor.

Beyond the perennial antitrust battles, Google has a host of other issues pending in Washington, from broadband access and net neutrality to privacy rights to patent reform and copyright policy.
And it hasn’t gone unnoticed in the lobbying community that Google has been quietly upping its participation in the Washington scene for nearly a year.

Not only was Google’s Schmidt on the campaign trail and on Obama’s economic advisory committee, but he also assumed the role of chairman of the influential New America Foundation early this year. Google didn’t donate money as a company, but Schmidt wrote a personal check of $1 million, single handedly financing a healthy portion of the foundation’s $12.9 million annual budget.

The New America Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy think tank, will clearly be at the center of the new administration’s thinking on economic issues: Schmidt and two other of its board members were among the 17 influential economic thinkers who stood behind Obama Friday.

“We’re looking forward to having more friends in the next administration,” said New America Foundation Vice President Rachel White. “But as an independent foundation, the chances are good that we’ll swim against the stream of some of the policies that the Obama administration puts forward.”

Anticipating the problems that can come from having prominent people with multiple agendas serving on the foundation’s board of directors, New America drew up a conflict of interest policy in June, saying, in part: “New America’s conflict of interest policy is not designed to eliminate or exclude relationships and activities that might create a duality of interest, but rather to encourage transparency and careful deliberation in those cases where conflicts or perceived conflicts may arise.” Source Unknown.

Aug 21

I recently wrote about Advanced Web Ranking, and the issues faced with that, but it transpires that Google has blocked all ranking software available for SEO’s and webmasters. Google is successful at presenting information to the world almost purely because that information has been presented to them, and by who? SEO’s of course. If it weren’t for us we’d have titles like “home”, and alt tags missing, which, although they can get abused at times, are still providing much needed information to the blind community. We use these softwares to measure how successful we are presenting our clients web-pages, and we require them to provide proof of our efforts.

Google has put itself in a position of authority, and is operating an intentional maneuver to secure more PPC business. I had never viewed it that way until my boss brought this to my attention this morning, and how very right he seems now. Google shouldn’t necessarily embrace SEO, but they are abusing their position as the worlds number one search engine and manipulating businesses to part with their cash in their on-going pursuit of becoming the internets China. Google and SEO need to be like two old band members that just tolerate each other for the greater good, occasionally we’ll bicker and we may even exchange the odd blow, but we’ll still stick together and maybe even swap Christmas cards, but right now Google has an AK47 pressed right between our eyes and they’re not afraid to pull a trigger or two.

Aug 6

There has been much in the way of ‘hype’ surrounding the search engine Cuil, but I’m struggling to see anything close to interesting about this whole sordid affair other than the 4 original developers have all at some point been employed by Google. And unfortunately for Cuil, unless there are some seismic reassessments of their aim as a Search Engine, that’s exactly where the Google parallels will end.

My Firefox home-page is set to BBC News, and every morning I will read the Technology section with keen eyes, seeking out any developments either by or affecting the search market, (and the occasional post of purely personal interest,) so when, one morning recently the leading story had been put up with the headline: Search Site Aims To Rival Google, I’m sure it will come as no surprise that I wee’d myself a little. It’s the equivalent of a Premiership footballer falling in to a deep vat of dangerously young girls, or Duffys’ record label giving her the green light to write another album of horrifically crap wankery, or me watching Fern Cotton dying painfully…anyway, this was the kind of headline you can wish for, but never truly expect to see. So I read the story, became intrigued, and went to test out Cuil.

Now, I remember one Christmas really REALLY wanting a mountain bike, and getting a pair of green corduroy trousers instead, so this is perhaps the second most disappointed I have ever been, but try it for yourselves, and form your own conclusions. It’s not the worst engine I’ve used, but a serious rival to Google it isn’t. I’m a more serious rival to Google, and as you’ve probably figured, I’m human, albeit a poorly assembled one.

To save me the rigmarole of ridiculously detailed critiques, I’ll resort to the age-old tactic of statistics, 90% of which are made up anyway:

  • Aesthetics 6/10 - Its’ best point, but trying too hard in fact
  • Functionality 2/10 - My personal opinion is that semantics are for people without the intelligence to know what they are looking for in the first place
  • Relevance of Results 0/10 - It’s insane, i think it must genuinely randomly pick some pages from its all too boasted of 120 billion index

That is truly the most damning statistic of them all. I could go in to huge depth about no-one having an allegiance to Google, and how all we want are the most relevance results, but I suffice to leave it there for the sake of the hernia thats been growing in the process of writing this.

Lets allow the results to speak for themselves. Given that my personal site did not appear in their indeces, I searched for “submit URL cuil” (without quotations), and the results were fascinating, completely irrelevant, but fascinating. Furthermore, it returned only 7 results! What happened to that 120 billion index? Googles’ minuscule index returned me a paltry 35,700.

“Cuil” is supposedly the Gaelic for “wisdom”, and I’m obliged to report that this shambles of a search engine clearly think we are not as Cuil as we merit.